Wisconsin 2022 elections: Who will run in the 46h Assembly District now that Gary Hebl is not running for re-election

 

Gary Hebl has served in the Wisconsin State Assembly since January 2005 in a solidly Democratic district.

Sources:  Ballotpedia

Wisconsin State Journal, 4/13/2022

With his retirement, Hebl, 70, becomes the seventh Assembly Democrat to announce they won’t be running for reelection. Thirteen Assembly Republicans have also announced they won’t be running for another term. In total, more than 20% of Assembly members are not running again — either because they’re retiring or opting for a different role.

46th Assembly District

Wikipedia 

Related reading:

 

Sun Prairie Star, 4/13/2022

Other Wisconsin 2022 races:

5th Assembly:  Jim Steineke.  (1/15.2022)

45th Assembly.  Mark Spreitzer.  (3/19/2022)
52nd Assembly:  Jeremy Thiefsfeldt.  (2/28/2022)
54th Assembly: Gordon Hintz.  (3/6/2022/

55th Assembly:  Rachael Cabral-Guevera.  (3/19/2022)
68th Aasembly: Jesse James.  (1/28/2022)
74th Assembly:  Beth Meyers.  (3/7/2022)

79th Assembly.  Dianne Hesselbein.  (3/18/2022)

84th Assembly: Mike Kuglitsch.  (3/1/2022)

5th Senate:  Dale Kooyenga.  (3/13/2022)

15th Senate:  Janis Ringhand.  (3/11/2022)

19th Senate:  Roger Roth.  (3/14/2022)

23rd Senate:  Kathy Bernier.  (3/15/2022)

25th Senate:  Janet Bewley.  (3/16/2022)

27th Senate:  Jon Erpenbach.  (3/17/2022)

29th Senate:  Jerry Petrowski.  (3/12/2022

GET ME REWRITE: State Senate President Pro Tempore Patrick Testin unhappy with this Wisconsin Supreme Court turndown

Headline:  Wisconsin State Journal, 4/13/2022

Pay to play transcribed at Wisconsin Democracy Campaign

Wisconsin’s highest court has declined to hear a case involving a Georgia timber company’s quest to build a frac sand facility on rare wetlands in western Wisconsin. 

The Supreme Court issued an order Wednesday denying Meteor Timber’s petition to reconsider findings of two lower courts and an administrative law judge who revoked the company’s permit for the proposed $75 million project. 

The one-sentence order did not state the court’s reasoning and noted only that Justice Rebecca Bradley dissented. Meteor was assessed $50 in court costs.

Original 5/22/2017 post, "Wisconsin DNR:  Pay to play trumps your tax dollars", starts here.

Photo credit:  McLanahan

Reported in DNR approves sand mining project with large wetlands loss.  (Milwaukee Jounnal Sentinel, 5/20/2017)

Graphic:  ITRC

Weld Riley campaign contributions

Reported at Meteor's Timber Power Game in Wisconsin.  (Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, 1/4/2017)

Other pay to play posts:

Concerning Rebecca Bradley: Meet some of the Wisconsin voters who would be disenfranchised by recusal rules.  (4/20/2017)
Pay to play the high-capacity well, Wisconsin Assembly Agriculture Committee way.  (3/24/2017)
Scott Walker and his for-profit college, pay-to-play buddies.  (2/10/2017)
Wisconsin is open for pay to play.  (2/3/2017)
In addition to $750,000 to Club for Growth, Harold Simmons donated $10,000 to Scott Walker.  (9/14/2016)
Developer finds that 'pay to play' costs more than $72,844.92.  (2/12/2016)
Meet the disingenuous Rob Brooks (R-Saukville).  (1/13/2016)
Wingra Stone looks for a return on its capitol investment.  (12/17/2016)
For sale: 1 state senator, 1 state representative.  (12/8/2015)
UPDATE. Sorry, Tim Geoghegan, a total of $11,750 in donations is not a "bunch of bull".  (10/25/2015) 
CAFOnated pay to play adds $84,000 to Scott Walker's campaign fund in 2011.  (10/7/2015)
Pay to play the payday way.  (7/5/2015)
From the pay-to-play archives: Grebe Pere, Grebe Fils.  (5/23/2015)
Appleton Post-Crescent Editorial Board All But Puts a Dunce Cap on the Head of Joel Kleefisch (R-Oconomowoc).  (1/24/2014)

GET ME REWRITE: Tough for Iowa and New Hampshire to make a case with these demographics

 

Sources:  U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts

Des Moines Register, 4/13/2022

Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina currently have waivers from the national party to hold their nominating contests before the rest of the country. The plan removes all four states from that early voting window and requires them — along with any others that want to hold early contests — to apply for a new waiver.

On the other hand....

Source:  U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts