Live Science, 7/3/2025
Now, a perspective piece authored by a group of virologists, veterinarians and health security experts argues that the plan would not only be ineffective, but could also increase the risk of the virus spilling over into humans and sparking a new pandemic. The researchers published their arguments July 3 in the journal Science.
"Essentially, the longer you allow a virus that has shown to be effective in infecting multiple hosts survive in an environment, the greater the chance you give it to spread, to mutate, and to try its luck at adaptation," perspective first-author Erin Sorrell, a virologist at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, told Live Science. "Worse case scenario, the virus adapts and expands its host range to become transmissible in humans … Now we have a pandemic."
Related posts:
March 2025
Chapter 1. (3/10) Censored
Chapter 2. (3/10)
Chapter 3. (3/10)
Chapter 4. (3/11)
Chapter 5. (3/12)
Chapter 6. (3/12)
Chapter 7. (3/13)
Chapter 8. (3/14)
Chapter 9. (3/14)
Chapter 10. (3/14)
Chapter 11. (3/14)
Chapter 12. (3/14)
Chapter 12. (3/14)
Chapter 13. (3/15)
Chapter 14. (3/18)
Chapter 15. (3/19)
Chapter 16. (3/19)
Chapter 17. (3/21)
Chapter 18. (3/22)
Chapter 19. (3/26)
Chapter 20. (3/28)
Chapter 21. (3/29)
Chapter 22. (3/30)
April 2025
Chapter 23. (4/1/)
Chapter 24. (4/2)
May 2025
Still getting snookered by RFKjr. (5/16)
Spineless behavior of Bill Cassidy M.D. unleashes more damage to United States health care system. (5/29)
June 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment