We just returned home from Andy’s basketball game at the old Elm Lawn
School. We walked the few blocks and
back in spite of the glaze of ice on the sidewalks. Yesterday the temperature reached the low
40s, melting some of our snow cover, the runoff pooling on the sidewalks and
driveways and freezing overnight.
Andy’s team won handily, 28-17. He scored 6 points, 4 of them in the final quarter, to help keep the other team at bay. Before that his shooting was atrocious. He had plenty of opportunities to score points but always rushed his shots, releasing the ball without thinking where it should go. JoAnna was hoping she might be able to practice with him after the game, but the gym wasn’t available.
At the library, we’ve been working on a rather ambitious project for
which the initial discussion and planning began about a year ago. The library’s current long-range plan for
service covers the years 1993-1997, so the library board and Area Leaders staff
(myself, Adult Services Librarian, Youth Services Librarian, and 3 fulltime
Library Assistants III – Circulation Services, Technical Services, and Computer
Operations) have been looking at ways to revise the document. Actually, the library has three planning
documents to guide our development: the
above-mentioned long-range plan, a technology plan, and a space need
evaluation.
The long-range plan contains specific goals and objectives for
improving and expanding library services.
For example, we would like to add another fulltime librarian to the
organizational chart: Young Adult
Services Librarian. In the case of our
particular needs, I have broadly defined young adults to include anyone from
ages 10 to 30. And there is a very good
reason for this. Currently, our Youth
Services Librarian does a very good job in reaching preschoolers and children
in the early elementary grades with an ambitious series of storytimes and
family programs during the school year and a popular summer reading program in
June and July. In the upper elementary
grades and into middle school (grades 6-8), we have a very noticeable drop-off
in participation. I’m sure there are a
variety of reasons for this, but there are two that seem most compelling to me. First of all, kids in the 4th, 5th grades and
6th grades start to get involved in a range of activities: sports, school clubs, music, etc. JoAnna and I already see this pattern
developing with Andy. He has a
smorgasbord of interests, which reduces the amount of time he has for
recreational reading. We at the library
can’t change the natural process of childhood development.
On the other hand, our present level of staffing places a limit on what
we can do. Studies have shown that the
earlier a library can reach a child, the more likely he or she will become a
lifelong user. As a result, we feel it
is very important to develop a program that emphasizes services to preschoolers
and children in the early elementary grades. Our Youth Services Librarian can
only do so much. The additional of a
Young Adult Services Librarian will allow us to develop programs and services not
only for middle- and high-school students but also for people in their 20s who
are just entering the job market and looking to enhance their
marketability. One of my ideas that I
take great pride in is a decision to develop a career and education section in
the library, an area where people will find resume books, college catalogs,
civil service test guides, scholarship information, and a variety of job
listings. On Monday, we’ll be unveiling
a public-access Internet computer station that will allow people to search a
variety of employment databases – or simple to explore the vast resources of
the Internet. A Young Adult Services
Librarian would allow us to promote this service more effectively and provide a
more personalized level of informal instruction in the library.
Another major goal in the library’s
long-range plan is to integrate the travel collection. In other words, we would shelve books,
videos, pamphlets, and perhaps even related magazines in one location. Middleton’s travel collection is consistently
one of the 2 or 3 most popular subject areas of nonfiction. So it makes sense to segregate it. The problem is – we are running out of room
to implement this idea.
Which brings us to the library’s space needs plan.
During the initial development of the library’s building program statement
in the late 1980s, the committee of library board members and city officials
realized we had some long-term growth issues to consider. Consequently, we made sure that the final
design of the library included room for future expansion. If you recall from your attendance at the
library’s dedication, the site that the city chose offers no room for outward
expansion. Railroad tracks to the
south. A parking lot to the west. Hubbard Avenue to the north. St. Luke’s Lutheran Church to the east. That limits the library’s expansion to a very
tight site, either a lower or upper level.
The committee agreed upon the construction of a full basement, which,
because of the natural north-to-south slope of the site, provides some natural
light to filter into this level.
The basement, or ‘lower level’ of the library, as we prefer to call it,
is now divided into four distinct areas:
a meeting room that will accommodate up to 140 persons theater-style
(chairs in rows), the ‘boiler room’ (HVAC, telephone), a 2,000-square-foot
storage area which the Friends of the Library use for their 3-to-4 times a year
book sales, the 10,000 square feet of unfinished space.
One of the most consistent complaints we’ve had since the library
opened in 1990 is that we’re too noisy.
And there is a good reason for that.
Although the city approved the construction of a new library, we know
that any additional staffing to go with it would be minimal. Consequently, we needed an open floor
plan. In other words, most of the public
space of the library had to be visible from the circulation desk, since that
was the only service desk staffed every hour we were opened. We couldn’t afford the cost of a separate,
walled-off children’ area since we realized from the state the city would never
ante up for the additional staff. As a
result, we tend to be a very noisy library whenever children’s programs are
scheduled and, for that matter, at many other times of the day. To address this problem, the board and staff
have talked above moving the reference desk, the adult nonfiction, and the
current and back issues of magazines to the lower level, and reconfiguring our
popular materials collections (new books, paperbacks, videos, audiocassettes,
books on tape, CDs, and books on tape) and Youth Services on the main
level. In that way, we confine the noise
to the main level and create a quiet place on the lower level.
The building planning committee originally predicted a twenty-year time
line between the opening of the new library and the need for additional
space. After almost seven years in a new
facility (hard to believe that much time has passed), we have literally run out
of space for some of the things we’d like to do, such as a major expansion of
the audiovisual collection. At this
point, if we add another range of shelving to display more titles, we’ll need
to reduce our display space for new magazines or the amount of seating space we
offer. Tough decisions, ones we face
ahead of schedule due to the immense popularity of the Middleton Public
Library. It's decisions like these that
make my responsibilities increasingly more challenging and interesting as I
approach the end of my 11th year of employment.
Why would I want to do anything else?
I can’t think of a single reason.
When JoAnna and I moved to Middleton, I found the perfect fit for my
library ambitions.
Which brings us to the library’s technology plan.
When I first started working at the Middleton Public Library, a
typewriter was still a commonly used piece of equipment. We checked out books and other materials
electronically and had a couple of personal computers. Now we own at least a dozen PCs, plus CD-ROM
drives, modems, and printers. There is
an ongoing need for staff training to ensure that we are using off this
equipment efficiently and a staff member who can be responsible for training,
troubleshooting, inventory, and other related tasks. In our last budget, a request to promote a
staff member to a newly created position of Library Assistant III for Computer
Operations was approved by the city council in December. As a result, we will be able to quickly
achieve many of the goals and objectives in our technology plan.
One important aspect of the review and consolidation of these three
documents is to gather community input on satisfaction with current library
services and support for the development of future library services. To accomplish this, the library board hired a
consultant to conduct a series of six focus group discussions. These are scheduled for the week of February
24-March 1 in the lower level meeting room.
During a staff meeting with the consultant, we developed the following cluster
of questions that will guide the discussions:
1.
What
do you think the Middleton Public Library does really well? What do y you think is really outstanding
about the library?
2.
What suggestions do you have for improving
any of the library’s services and programs?
In what areas might the library improve?
3.
The Middleton Public Library has operated
out of its present facility for nearly seven years. What do you think work well in terms of the
facility?
4.
The library has approximately 10,000 square
feet of unfinished space on the lower level of the building. What suggestions do you have for
reconfiguring the whole building for library use?
5.
Let’s talk about automation at the
library. Does there seem to be enough
computers and terminals to use? Are they
in convenient locations for you? How
comfortable are you using the computers at the library? Has there been adequate training available to
you?
Once these six discussion groups have been conducted – and, obviously,
no library staff will be present at any of these sessions since we don’t want
to inhibit the discussion – the consultant will prepare a report in time for
review at the March library board meeting.
I certainly hope that it will have some concrete suggestions as to how
we should move forward to improve services.
We had planned to catch the first showing of Star Wars at the Point Cinemas this afternoon, but
an article on the front page of this morning’s Capital
Times made us reconsider our plans: Fans
line up for hours to see Star Wars. How
early? Well, at University Square, a
4-screen multiplex bordering the UW campus, people started to line up at 8
a.m. Eight hours later, all tickets for
the day’s showings were sold out. After
reading this, I figured a phone call to Point was in order. Surprisingly, I was able to reach a real
person instead of a recorded message.
The young woman who answered informed me that all four shows were sold
out. The boys took the news in
stride. After all, I would have told
them if they went ballistic, “It’s only a movie, and one that you’ve seen many
times already. We’ll go next weekend
when the initial hoopla has died down.”
The Star Wars saga continued. It’s a crazy
commercial world we live in. Tuesday’s New York Times featured a perceptive article on the
merchandising aspects of the phenomenon:
“The Return of the Merchandiser: As
the Millennium Approaches, Star Wars Is Back on Screen and in Stores”. It’s obvious that some of the people
interviewed for this article are living in a fantasyland.
Example #1. Jeffrey Galsick, a 20th-Century Fox
spokesperson: “This isn’t just about
marketing. It’s something for the fans,
and we don’t want to lose sight of that.”
Example #2. Lynn Hale, a
Lucasfilm spokesperson: “This really
doesn’t have anything to do with the film coming out. All of this is independent of the film
release.”
“All of this” is the marketing blitz accompanying the re-release of the
Star Wars trilogy. Obviously, Ms. Hale is single and has no
nieces and nephews – or any contact with young children. Actually, we know she’s just a paid
mouthpiece for George Lucas, who is either the most naïve man in the world or
under the impression that everyone else is an acquisitive moron.
I remember seeing Star Wars in Springfield, 20 years ago when it was first released. In spite of the dazzling special effects, I walked away less than impressed. I don’t need explosions and whooshing spaceships to keep my attention. I enjoy a film that dares to emphasize characterization and a sense of place. Unfortunately, I seem to be in a very distinct minority.
To me, the key piece of
information in the Times article is that George Lucas, the creator the Star Wars empire, prepared a marketing plan for
merchandising that extends into the 21st century. It includes television advertising, theme
park “Star tours”, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut promotions, a Smithsonianexhibition, and more. I’m not
complaining. Eddie hasn’t turned into a
basket case as a result of his fascination with Star Wars. Still, though, it’s an amazing
piece of Americana that will very likely infect Andy’s and Eddie’s
children. I’m convinced it has that kind
of longevity.
No comments:
Post a Comment