Sunday, December 6, 2015

Dear Scott Walker and Laurel Patrick, When it comes to transparency, it's just so much blather, isn't it?



As quoted in Scott Walker Tried To Quietly Gut Wisconsin's Sunshine Laws. (Huffington Post, 7/8/2015)

Look what's going on now, folks.

Scott Walker administration finding new way to deny public records.  (Madison.com, 12/5/2015)

So much for 'as they are being formed'.  In at least two recent cases, the administration says it doesn’t have to keep certain “transitory” records and therefore can’t release records it doesn’t have.

That judgment is based on the decisions of an obscure eight-member body appointed by the governor and other state officials to oversee state records retention policy.

Related posts:
So I appointed 5 of my Republican Assembly colleagues and allowed them to meet behind closed doors.  (8/12/2015)
Wisconsin Assembly Republicans are hoping that voters are not paying attention on Tuesday, November 8, 2016.  (7/10/2015)
Dear Scott Walker, As for the awareness question, a simple "yes" would have sufficed.  (7/7/2015) 
The road not taken by Joint Finance Co-Chair Nygren and Assembly Speaker Vos.  (7/7/2015) 
Open records and Scott Walker's concerns with constituents' privacy.  (7/5/2015)
Scott Walker does David Bowie.  (7/4/2015)
Open records and Scott Walker's irresolute response.  (7/4/2015) 
When it comes to transparency, ALEC wants to have it both ways.  (7/4/2015)
You have to wonder what dictionary Joint Finance co-chair John Nygren is working from.  (7/3/2015) 
Assembly Speaker Robin Vos's definition of transparency: All the self-serving Republican news releases I see fit to print
Good question, Albert Darling. So why the lack of transparency in Wisconsin? (7/3/2015)

No comments:

Post a Comment