Photo credits: Wisconsin Court System
Reported in Wisconsin Supreme Court urged to adop stricter rules. (Madison.com, 3/15/2017)
Petition: In re rule for recusal when a party or lawyer has made a large campaign contribution.
Related post:
Breaking the law. Just imagine the GOP outrage if Shirley Abrahamson was a featured speaker at, say, a La Crosse County Democratic Party fete. (3/3/2017)
Bought and paid for: Wisconsin's conservative Supreme Court Justices and their tainted campaign contributions. (5/14/2015)
Oriignal 3/13/2017 post, "'Precious' Roggensack worries about WI Supreme Court integrity", starts here.
Too late!
Related reading:
Court measure, billed as move toward congeniality, seen as rip on Abrahamson. (Wisconsin Watch, 1/20/2015)
Campaign Money Tests Wisconsin Justices’ Impartiality. (The New York Times, 3/27/2015)
Undisclosed Dark Money Reigns Supreme in Wisconsin Campaigns and Elections. (The Center for Media and Democracy's PR Watch, 10/5/2016)
No comments:
Post a Comment