When it comes to framing the 2024 presidential election, Peter Baker and the New York Times get it terribly wrong

 

New York Times

A word search shows that 'authoritarianism' does not appear in the article.

And the only use of 'democracy' is this shortsighted babblefest.

The looming showdown between President Biden and former President Donald J. Trump, assuming Nikki Haley cannot pull off a hail-mary surprise, goes beyond the binary liberal-conservative split of two political parties familiar to generations of Americans. It is at least partly about ideology, yes, but also fundamentally about race and religion and culture and economics and democracy and retribution and most of all, perhaps, about identity.

Related posts:

Donald Trump:  Unfit to be President.  (1/23/2024)

Project 2025:  Heritage Foundation parties like it's 1933.   (1/23/2024)

Keeping tabs on the times when Trump sez he aced cognitive test.  (1/22/2024)

Blueprint for the genocide of transexuals (among many other despicable goals).  (1/19/2024)

Meet the men of white privilege behind the GOP death wish for the planet:  Project 2025.  (1/17/2024)